Subject	3" expansion downpipes would be a must with 3" TPs and cat
Posted by	MixManMash on April 03, 2015 at 12:35 PM
	This message has been viewed 320 times.
In Reply To	Re: I would recommend against this turbo and so would many posted by Tony90zx on April 03, 2015 at 10:32 AM
Message	back exhaust. Or you can do 3" DPs, with 3" -> 2.5" TPs and use your existing 2.5" cat back. If you are going to be running E85, better look at BDE top feeds with 1200cc injectors and 2 Walboro 485 pumps. Even with those mods, GTX2863 is a better choice than GTX2867s.
Follow Ups	gtx 2867r - Tony90zx 04:28:25 04/03/15 Re: gtx 2867r - dfenton2 05:40:45 04/03/15 there's gotta be something wrong with that engine or tune - puchy 08:40:04 04/03/15 Hmm...I did 620whp @20psi on E85 and GT2560s - ForceFedTT (SoCal) 17:33:15 04/03/15 stock IC piping, fmic, 2.5" exhaust isn't helping - Zvil (FL) 18:37:06 04/03/15 I realize Im biased (my car is running 2860rs turbos) - Zsgetyoulaid 23:00:07 04/03/15 I would recommend against this turbo and so would many - MixManMash 07:55:57 04/03/15 Re: I would recommend against this turbo and so would many - Tony90zx 10:32:20 04/03/15 Devoured DP?! How did they taste? (n/m) - bartz32tt 11:43:02 04/03/15 Didn't pair well with the duel springs ... - ConVerTT 13:25:31 04/03/15 3" expansion downpipes would be a must with 3" TPs and cat - MixManMash 12:35:28 04/03/15 648 WHP with pump gas and boostane @ 24 psi with GTX2863R - SammybTT(TN) 21:06:54 04/03/15 Re: 648 WHP with pump gas and boostane @ 24 psi with GTX2863R - Tony90zx 04:31:56 04/04/15 Talk to Greg @ SZ. He's tuned a few GTX2867R cars. He - MixManMash 08:25:57 04/04/15
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.